CNA Staff, May 16, 2025 /
14:09 pm
Here is a roundup of recent pro-life and abortion-related news:
HHS investigates conscience rights case
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is reviewing a hospital for compliance with federal conscience protections following reports that the hospital had denied ultrasound technicians exemptions from participating in abortions.
The department’s Office for Civil Rights on May 12 announced it had opened a review to investigate violations of free exercise and conscience protections.
Though unnamed in the HHS announcement, the legal group involved in the case confirmed in a statement that it had contact with the HHS about a hospital in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
The legal group American Center for Law and Justice alleged that Presbyterian Hospital was requiring religious staff to assist in abortions. The hospital had changed its policy in late 2024, requiring participation in abortion procedures, “even for longtime employees with religious objections,” said the law firm’s executive director, Jordan Sekulow.
After the firm sent a demand letter highlighting federal religious freedom requirements, the hospital granted the religious accommodation for five ultrasound technicians in February.
A federal investigation of this nature “is both rare and significant,” Sekulow said.
“It sends a powerful message to health care institutions across the country: You cannot force medical professionals to choose between their careers and their faith,” Sekulow added.
South Carolina Supreme Court rules in favor of heartbeat law
The South Carolina Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of a law that protects unborn babies at around six weeks after conception through what is known as a heartbeat law.
The law prohibits abortions from being performed on unborn children with “cardiac activity, or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart, within the gestational sac.” An ultrasound can detect an unborn baby’s cardiac activity at about six weeks.
In the unanimous ruling, judges acknowledged that South Carolina’s law was medically imprecise but maintained that lawmakers on both sides saw it as a six-week ban on abortion.
Planned Parenthood argued in the lawsuit that the “or” in the law meant doctors should be able to terminate unborn children until the major parts of the heart come together, around nine weeks.
Missouri passes referendum seeking repeal of abortion rights amendment
A referendum seeking the repeal of Missouri’s abortion rights amendment moved forward in the state Senate on Wednesday.
(Story continues below)
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Missouri lawmakers approved a referendum that would repeal Amendment 79, an abortion rights amendment that voters passed in November 2024.
The measure passed in the state Senate by a 21-11 vote and in the House last month.
The referendum would also replace the amendment with protections against abortion for unborn children in most cases, with some exceptions for medical emergencies or if the unborn child has a fetal anomaly as well as in cases of rape or incest.
The measure would also prohibit gender transition surgeries, hormone treatments, and puberty blockers for minors.
The constitutional amendment would be open to voters in November 2026. If Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe calls for a special election, it could be voted on sooner.
Executive Director of Coalition Life Brian Westbrook called the passage an “opportunity to correct course” for Missouri voters in a statement to CNA.
“Protecting the unborn, safeguarding parental rights, and preserving the integrity of our health care system are not partisan issues — they are moral imperatives that speak to the heart of who we are as Missourians,” Westbrook said.
Kate Quiñones is a staff writer for Catholic News Agency and a fellow of the College Fix. She has been published by the Wall Street Journal, the Denver Catholic Register, and CatholicVote, and she graduated from Hillsdale College. She lives in Colorado with her husband.
Credit: Source link
